1 Prisoners are not exchanged until hostilities have ended. If the war-as in Malaysia-were left to “fade away” over an indefinite period of years, so would our POWs. This scenario furnished the Pentagon with pleasant dreams for many months but turned out to have two drawbacks: one for the US, the other for Thieu and the US.įor the US, it left unsolved the problem of the POWs. Under Vietnamization, Thieu’s troops were gradually to take over all combat activity as a worn-down enemy slowly faded away. The answer is that the cease-fire agreement was necessary in order to cope with the unforeseen weaknesses of the Vietnamization policy. To understand this paradox one must begin by asking oneself why there had to be a cease-fire agreement. The first of these keys lies in a paradox: Nixon and our military had to get out in order to stay in. On the eve of the new international conference on Vietnam, it is useful to sum up just where we stand with the cease-fire and to try to find some keys to what the future holds for us in Southeast Asia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |